moonvoice: (Default)
[personal profile] moonvoice
Here is some information on the temperament of the Tibetan Mastiff that I found particularly appealing:

They are excellent family dogs - for the right family - and you will find them to be unlikely to eat your babies. Owners must understand canine psychology and be willing and able to assume the primary leadership position. Lack of consistent, rational discipline can result in the creation of dangerous, unpredictable dogs. In this case, baby-eating may be a problem (although this is true of virtually every dog breed, it is more likely with a large, primitive breed.)

For the Lulz

Date: 2010-06-19 12:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] perzephone.livejournal.com
People never seem to understand why I find wikipedia to be an unacceptable source.

Re: For the Lulz

Date: 2010-06-19 12:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] white9-fox.livejournal.com
It's actually not that bad for looking up random info or finding a starting point, studies have been done by professionals to cross-check wikipedia with other databases and wiki is spot on for the most part.

But in terms of argumentation and research papers, yea, I side with you.

Re: Someone is Wrong on the Internet!

Date: 2010-06-19 12:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] perzephone.livejournal.com
Arguing on the internet is one of my hobbies - wikipedia references are guaranteed to make me whip out my stomping boots.

/stomps on your invalid user-edited citations...

/stompstompstomp

Re: For the Lulz

Date: 2010-06-19 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darakat-ewr.livejournal.com
But of course academic sources are always correct! (sarcasm mode)

Re: For the Lulz

Date: 2010-06-20 01:41 pm (UTC)

Profile

moonvoice: (Default)
moonvoice

September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 2930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 08:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios