Re: Rambling

Date: 2009-05-07 02:03 am (UTC)
The shaman was never a solitary practitioner, but a pillar in the community. I've had difficulty taking the concept of a solitary shaman seriously

There are cultures where solitary shamans are acceptable. Shamans who become not so much the custodians of a human community, but a community of spirits instead.

There are also, of course, accounts of shamans who - in using their powers to curse and harm others - are ostracised from their community. As they generally still have the spirits around them, and 'serve' a community (in a fairly harmful way), I think they remain shamans even once they have been ostracised. Especially if the community keeps giving them power by calling them a 'bad shaman*,' instead of a 'bad person.' I believe this was true in some areas of Siberia, and Neil Whitehead writes about feared, and yet solitary/ostracised shamans (Kanaima) in Guyana.

So it does happen, in Indigenous culture at that.

And I agree, extreme independence is a flag for mental illness for me too, imho. Just as over-dependence is.

* Or whatever term is accurate in their dialect.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

moonvoice: (Default)
moonvoice

September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 2930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 01:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios