A series of work in progress shots.
This is still incomplete, but as I finished the inking today, I can now show you a series of WIP shots from conception to finishing.
This illustration, the most complex I've ever done, is a trade with an editor for significant editing on my novel Every Day Awake. Knowing that I could never afford to get the book professionally edited, and that she could not afford an illustration of this calibre, we traded. I don't usually trade, but I was willing to make an exception in this case.
From this:

To this:












Stay tuned for another post showing detail shots of the completed inked illustration.
This is still incomplete, but as I finished the inking today, I can now show you a series of WIP shots from conception to finishing.
This illustration, the most complex I've ever done, is a trade with an editor for significant editing on my novel Every Day Awake. Knowing that I could never afford to get the book professionally edited, and that she could not afford an illustration of this calibre, we traded. I don't usually trade, but I was willing to make an exception in this case.
From this:

To this:












Stay tuned for another post showing detail shots of the completed inked illustration.
Wow!
Date: 2011-09-13 07:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 07:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 08:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 09:57 am (UTC)As an aside, if you ever need a pair of eyes for anything, feel free to poke me. You have my e-mail, I think. If you don't, it's my username here @gmail. Short work isn't difficult to set time aside for, longer work would take some doing. I don't know how many folk you have available for crit/beta, so... just offering. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 12:21 am (UTC)Nothing much changed actually from the original conception. I did go through with Katt and we looked at about 40 different forest pictures so I could get an idea of what sort of things she liked. It's probably a bit more complex than I thought it would be, in terms of the background and how complex that is.
That said, I found it easier to do an illustration this size in 'pieces,' first the bottom two left corners, and then the two trees (the 'frame'), and then the mid-ground, and finally the background. It just wasn't possible to do this in my normal method of sketching the whole thing out first, and then inking it all out, it was just too intricate - and that much graphite pencil can destroy the quality of the illustration board (which is why my sketches are actually so light and 'brief', because while comprehensive sketches look nice, all that graphite - which repels water - can cause real problems during the colouring process if it's too heavy and gets embedded in the board; the little things that influence how I work! The same is true of pastels. If you overwork the pastel paper, you lose the grain, and then the final highlight colours look dull - so your sketches directly onto the pastel paper have to be as brief and as light as possible, with little to no reworking).
The one thing I did drop from the illustration entirely was a lopsided signpost, with dull writing on it. It was originally going to be near the wallabies. But I felt it was too angular and messed with the shape / feel of the lines too much, and ditched it.
/ramble.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 12:25 am (UTC)Re: Wow!
Date: 2011-09-14 12:26 am (UTC)Re: Wow!
Date: 2011-09-14 01:10 am (UTC)Editing *laugh* -- for me it was all patchwork and on-the-job training. There weren't any classes on it at the university I attended.
Re: Wow!
Date: 2011-09-14 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 01:47 am (UTC)It's interesting that you didn't draft it out first to really get an idea about proportion/scale. I understand why you wouldn't do it on the piece itself, but I would have expected something of this magnitude to take some rough work to get it all to fall into place. You obviously have considerable ability to visualize, and to remember those images. (Which is not really a surprise, but still remarkable.)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 01:51 am (UTC)That said, the process on this was so slow, that I could mentally keep shifting things in my head as it went along. And the 10 foot rule (step back 10 feet - or 6 feet in a smaller room and survey the picture from a distance) meant I could keep perspective.
But yeah, I've always been less of a typical artist in that respect. I sometimes wonder if drafting would improve my artwork if I could ever get the hang of it, but I just don't enjoy hindering the mental composition shuffling by locking things onto the page - since I can do it so much quicker in my head. I always kind of likened it to having all the pieces of a large puzzle - the tree piece, the animal piece, and picking them up and moving them around. Likewise, I can do different colour schemes in my head - like Photoshop's hue change. It's just... more fun. :)