moonvoice: (o - games - eleven of pokemon?)
[personal profile] moonvoice
Would you use an oracle deck if it was standard playing card size? (I.e. quite small for the hands in terms of shuffling?)

Normally I prefer larger decks, but 3.5 x 2.5 inches is the standard size offered and I am thinking about tweaking with layout to see if I can work with this size.

If I can, would you work with this size?

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 57

Standard playing card size (3.5 x 2.5 inches) for a tarot / oracle deck, what do you think?

For an art deck, it's kind of small, so I'd wait for a larger format.
6 (10.5%)

For an art deck, it's kind of small, but I'd still use that format.
34 (59.6%)

I don't care what size as long as I can use your artwork for self-work and divination already!!!
27 (47.4%)

I'm sight or vision impaired, that size is too small.
3 (5.3%)

I guess I'd get it, but I'd probably wait for a larger size.
4 (7.0%)

I suppose this is where I vote for the ticky box?
26 (45.6%)



Also, infinite thanks to [personal profile] tsukikokoro who has gotten me thinking about this in different ways, as well. :)
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

moonvoice: (Default)
moonvoice

September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 2930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 12:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios