Heh. Maybe looks so obviously happy and comfortable, and Moet's casual "Hi" is endearing. :) As for the cross stitch, that's an awful lot of very delicate work. A house with flower gardens? I can see a flowering tree in the bottom left, yes? Also, pardon the ignorance of the question please -- I know nothing of embroidery -- but why would you do the flowers (which appear to stick out a little more) as opposed to the greenery/house in the background which appear to require a flatter stitch? Or are they all the same thickness and I'm just not understanding how it works?
The raised flowers are the french knots I've been complaining talking about. So you have the regular flat cross-stitch (in the cross-shape), and then the circular things are evil french knots. Heh.
And yes! You've picked it - house with flower gardens. :)
Heh. Thank you for the explanation, and my apologies for my lack of clarity earlier. On rereading I realized that I phrased the question exceedingly badly. (Yes, clear evidence that English is not my native tongue!) How I meant that question was whether the French knots forming the flowers were raised, and if so if it was because they were overlaid over a flatter supporting stitch, or raised on their own. If I understand correctly they are sufficiently raised on their own that they're set in the fabric just like the flatter stitches. It's amazing that you can essentially "sculpt" in 3D using embroidery thread.
Oh yeah, they are raised above a flat stitch. They would have stood out on their own without the flat stitch beneath them, but I don't like leaving white spaces (more than I can help) so I do regular cross-stitches beneath the french knots. :)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
complainingtalking about. So you have the regular flat cross-stitch (in the cross-shape), and then the circular things areevilfrench knots. Heh.And yes! You've picked it - house with flower gardens. :)
no subject
no subject