moonvoice: (Default)
moonvoice ([personal profile] moonvoice) wrote2008-06-19 08:53 am

[Pagan Prompt] Should you be vegetarian and pagan?

Many characterize paganism as an umbrella term "earth-centered" religions. Following from that there is an idea that pagans should be dedicated to honoring all life and be caretakers of the earth. The next jump made by many is that pagans should therefore refrain from eating meat. What do you think? Do pagans have a responsibility to honor all life and thus be vegetarians?


Following from that there is an idea that pagans should be dedicated to honoring all life and be caretakers of the earth. The next jump made by many is that pagans should therefore refrain from eating meat. What do you think? Do pagans have a responsibility to honor all life and thus be vegetarians?

This is, to me, such a flawed premise.

The thing is, it firstly assumes that pagans can only honour nature by 'letting it live' all the time. It completely denies the importance, and sacredness of death; and it ignorantly forgets that there is a natural life/death cycle with everything we do. I actually find it quite anti-nature, and anti-pagan, to forget that there is a natural life and death cycle that we are constantly a part of.

I mean we kill and eat plants while they're still living, even vegetarians need to own their part in killing to eat. Plants aren't exempt from being alive, sacred, or even potentially sentient just because they lack a central nervous system or can't scream in pain. We know that plants don't like being damaged and eaten, because many plants have evolved sophisticated and sometimes energy-consuming techniques to prevent it from happening.

I think that all life is equal, regardless of whether I can anthropomorphise it or not. I think that plants are equal to animals, and therefore it is hypocritical of me to value the lives of animals over the lives of plants just because we don't hear plants scream or see them struggle. I also find it kind of amusing that some vegetarians feel more superior than non-vegetarians, yet they are actually consuming a living being while it is still alive. Those fresh, raw vegetables are all living beings that still have a chance of living a full life in the ground - it is our call to strip it of its life in our digestive tract; often without thinking about it or even saying thank you for the sacrifice of the plants.

You would also hope that all vegetarians didn't ever kill any insects or trap mice or basically hurt anything that was 'animal like,' if that is their primary reason for eating vegies - 'respecting nature.' You can't logically have it both ways. If you refuse to eat meat because you see the sacredness in life, then how can you justify not being heart-broken every time you step on an ant, or inhale a dust mite?

The thing is, I feel that if people are using the 'respecting life / sacredness of life' reason as a justification for vegetarianism (as opposed to health reasons, or even just not wanting to eat battery meat / factory farmed animals (who does?)) then they are simply refusing to give the same sense of equality to all animals, let alone all living things. It's convenient, but I'm not sure if it's a really respectable way of being as a pagan.

I think there are a lot of flawed assumptions amongst those who think that eating vegetables only is more respectful than ever eating meat. Assumptions based on misunderstandings of the life/death cycle and the sacredness of death, assumptions based on the value of animals over plants, assumptions even based on cuter animals over the less cute ones (like insects or dust mites or mosquitoes)... so my answer is actually No. There is no reason that a pagan should be a vegetarian because they are pagan. There are plenty of reasons to be vegetarian, but 'respecting life,' is one of the flawed reasons, imho.

Re: A rambling response....

[identity profile] minxee.livejournal.com 2008-06-19 05:58 am (UTC)(link)
And it's awesome to be able to make these choices about our own fertility.

Do you cop alot of flak from friends/parents for your choice?

I think 'choice' is the most important thing for me...I'd hate to think that my lifestyle or nature would be able to take away my choices about my own fertility, but if that were to happen, I'd live with it. I wouldn't pursue IVF.

Re: Childfree = Carefree (Almost)

[identity profile] perzephone.livejournal.com 2008-06-19 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, my parents are long dead, so there was no pressure from them to have kids.

My sisters offered to pay me to have a kid and give it to them. Almost everyone I meet assumes that 'I don't have kids... YET'. People also call me selfish and tell me that one day I'll be ready to 'grow up and start a family', and some people w/kids are condescending nitwits who assume they can treat me like a child because I don't have any - holey moley, I'm 34!.

My husband had a vasectomy at 20, years before we even met & there was one discussion w/his parents about the possiblity of him having it reversed so we could give the mother-in-law a grandchild. I think the look of death I threw at her was enough to let her know that was a big fat no chance.

I do try to tone down my own preachiness - I hurt a good friend of mine by openly voicing my disapproval of large families on my blog (she's overweight, too - no affect on her fertility at all, she's got 6 kids), my political stance on welfare-moms, the financial unfairness that the child-free suffer from, the virtues of Zero Population Growth policies, etc.